![]() ![]() ![]() The use port 80 traffic outbound used mostly by browsers HTTP traffic and port 443 traffic HTTPS and thus will work with any ethernet connection that has a path to the internet without the ned for IT to setup a firewall route and without modifying firewall rules. What did work was adding a dot to the end of the hostname:. local to the end of the hostname did not work nor did pruning DNS servers from system preferences. The solutions in my list all work off a brokered connection over standard ports and protocols much like the hardware solutions you mentioned. I ran into this exact problem: I was able to connect from macOS via IP address but not via FQDN (like ). ![]() One of the solutions in my list provides access to the entire network or can be limited by device as you wish. One of the solutions I mentioned will run on multiple PC's and servers and any of them can broker a connection and provide a layer 2 or 3 connection to the LAN and provide redundancy by default where the hardware device does not without adding another expensive hardware device.Ī lot of what has been discussed here like Logmein, Teamviwer, Splashtop, etc are desktop remote access solutions and only provide a remote connection to a desktop, laptop,server, tablet or phone. If the E W O N or tosibox dies then you lose access to your whole network. Could you use them to access a multi machine network sure but the connection could get bogged down fast depending on the amount of remote work. 2022:02:21-07:57:11 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 25: disconnected: Broken pipeĢ022:02:21-08:14:10 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 11: disconnected: Connection timed outĢ022:02:21-08:45:17 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 26: authenticated: user='UTM-User-XY'Ģ022:02:21-08:45:17 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 26: start screen requested: REF_CliConVpnĢ022:02:21-08:45:18 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 26: connector startedĢ022:02:21-08:45:18 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: id="2201" username="UTM-User-XY" event="Connection started" sub="vpn" variant="clv" sys="SecureNet" severity="info" srcip="87.139.108.170" service="HTML5 VPN" type="VNCRDesktop" sessionid="26" sessionname="VPN UTM-User-XY"Ģ022:02:21-08:45:28 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 26: connector stopped: 8Ģ022:02:21-08:45:28 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: id="2202" username="UTM-User-XY" event="Connection stopped" sub="vpn" variant="clv" sys="SecureNet" severity="info" srcip="87.139.108.170" service="HTML5 VPN" type="VNCRDesktop" sessionid="26" sessionname="VPN UTM-User-XY"Ģ022:02:21-08:46:03 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 26: disconnected: Broken pipeĢ022:02:21-09:01:05 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 11: disconnected: Broken pipeĢ022:02:21-09:02:22 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 27: authenticated: user='UTM-User-XY'Ģ022:02:21-09:02:22 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 27: start screen requested: REF_CliConVpnĢ022:02:21-09:02:24 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 27: connector startedĢ022:02:21-09:02:24 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: id="2201" username="UTM-User-XY" event="Connection started" sub="vpn" variant="clv" sys="SecureNet" severity="info" srcip="87.139.108.170" service="HTML5 VPN" type="VNCRDesktop" sessionid="27" sessionname="VPN UTM-User-XY"Ģ022:02:21-09:02:32 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: Client 27: connector stopped: 8Ģ022:02:21-09:02:32 Sophos-UTM screenmgr: id="2202" username="UTM-User-XY" event="Connection stopped" sub="vpn" variant="clv" sys="SecureNet" severity="info" srcip="87. would you recommend using any of the above mentioned routers versus a solution such as E W O N or Tosibox?Īs far as E W O N or tosibox they are single point solutions and made for a single machine or cell. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |